Pay Transparency Coming to DC

NEWSLETTER VOLUME 2.5

|

January 31, 2024

Editor's Note

Pay Transparency Coming to DC

Washington DC is probably the most Constitutional and least Democratic governmental entity in the United States.

 

That's because its existence is established by Article I, Section 8 of the US Constitution, which gives Congress the right to establish the seat of the Federal Government and to enact legislation for it "in all cases whatsoever."

 

The Constitution also says the District is not to exceed 10 miles square. DC is currently 68.3 square miles, which is apparently consistent with the Constitution because 10 miles square is 100 square miles, not 10 square miles.

 

Even more confusing, DC started out as 100 square miles. But Congress didn't do a very good job of managing the District and ended up giving a chunk of it back to Virginia in the 1830's. Virginia was more than fine with this because it included Alexandria, which was a major port in the slave trade. Slave owners had been worried that that abolitionists in Congress would end slavery in the District. But as part of the retrocession, Congress only abolished trading slaves in the District, not holding slaves, which they could do because they got rid of the places where slaves were traded.

 

Despite living in an area designated in the Constitution, the citizens of the District of Columbia are not represented in Congress because they are not residents of any state and only citizens of states are represented in Congress.

 

This means that there are about 683,000 people who are governed by Congress but who have no representation there. And 44% of them are Black.

 

DC does have its own government though. It is governed by a Mayor and a 13 member Council. The Council passes laws, which then go to the Mayor for signature, then on to Congress for review. For civil laws like a new pay transparency law Congress then has 30 legislative days (meaning days they are actually in session) to say nope. Saying nope means both the Senate and the House have to pass a joint resolution to disapprove the law, and that resolution must also be signed by the President.

 

Basically, a dysfunctional Congress gives DC more freedom because its laws go into effect when Congress does nothing.

 

So, expect DC's new pay transparency law to become effective in June 2024. Here are the details from Seyfarth Shaw.

 

- Heather Bussing

 

Seyfarth Synopsis:  On January 12th, the District of Columbia’s Mayor signed legislation requiring employers to disclose salary ranges in all job listings and position descriptions advertised. Under the Act, employers will also be required to disclose to applicants, prior to an interview, any healthcare benefits they may receive. Employers are also prohibited from seeking wage history of prospective employees or using it to screen prospective employees. The final step before becoming law is a 30-day congressional review.

Mayor Bowser recently signed D.C. Act 25-367 “Wage Transparency Omnibus Amendment Act of 2023” which will amend the Wage Transparency Act of 2014. The action puts Washington, D.C. one step closer to joining the growing list of jurisdictions requiring pay ranges in job listings and advertisements. If the Act survives the 30-day Congressional review, the new law, which applies to employers with at least one employee in the District, will also require employers to disclose to prospective employees the existence of healthcare benefits they may receive, prior to the first interview. It will also expand DC’s current law to prohibit employers from seeking wage history information of prospective employees or screening prospective employees based on their wage history. The Office of the Attorney General will have enforcement authority. If the Act is not disapproved during the upcoming 30-day Congressional review, it will become effective as of June 30, 2024.

Required Pay Disclosures in Job Listings and Position Descriptions Advertised

The Act will require that employers provide the minimum and maximum projected salary or hourly pay in all job listings and position descriptions advertised. In stating the minimum and maximum salary or hourly pay for the position, the range must extend from the lowest to the highest salary or hourly pay that the employer in good faith believes at the time of the posting it would pay for the advertised job, promotion, or transfer opportunity.

Healthcare Benefit Disclosure Prior to Interview

The Act also requires that employers include information on the healthcare benefits offered to employees before the first interview. The law does not define “first interview,” nor does it specify whether a general description of the benefits is sufficient or if more detailed information may be required. There is no requirement, however, to include the healthcare benefit information in the job posting for the open position.

If an employer fails to disclose the pay range in a job listing or advertised position description, or fails to disclose the existence of healthcare benefits prior to the interview, the prospective employee is permitted to ask about such disclosures.

Prohibition on Seeking or Using “Wage History”

The Act will also limit employers’ ability to seek or use a prospective employee’s wage history in several ways.  First, it prohibits employers from screening prospective employees based on their “wage history,” including by requiring that the wage history satisfy minimum or maximum criteria or by requiring the prospective employee to disclose their wage history as a condition of being interviewed or continuing to be considered for an offer of employment. Second, the Act will also prohibit employers from seeking the wage history of a prospective employee from a person who previously employed the individual. The term “wage history” is defined as “information related to compensation an employee has received from other or previous employment.” Further, the definition of “compensation” is expansive and includes “all forms of monetary and nonmonetary benefits an employer provides or promises to provide an employee in exchange for the employee’s services to the employer.”

Required Notice of Rights

Covered employers will also have another notice to add to the collection of required federal and state employment posters. This new Act will require employers to post a notice in a conspicuous place in the workplace notifying employees of their rights under the Wage Transparency Act. The notice must be posted in at least one location where employees congregate.

Enforcement and Potential Remedies

The Act will authorize the Attorney General to investigate whether an employer has violated the Act, including examining witnesses under oath, issuing subpoenas, compelling attendance of witnesses and production of documents, and taking depositions and affidavits. It also allows the Attorney General to bring a civil action against an employer for violating the Act for restitution or for injunctive, compensatory, or other authorized relief for an individual or the public at large. If successful, the Attorney General will be entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs and statutory penalties equal to any administrative penalties provided by law.

Next Steps for Employers

While the Act still must pass Congressional review, DC employers should start taking steps now to prepare to comply with these requirements and prohibitions. Employers should consider how they will appropriately identify pay ranges to include in their job postings. For those employers who have already begun to include pay ranges in all of their postings to address the patchwork of laws in other jurisdictions requiring such disclosures, you should consider whether your current approach to disclosures will be compliant in DC.

In addition to preparing to update job postings and advertised job descriptions, employers should also consider training for hiring managers, talent acquisition, and other human resources professionals to ensure there is a process in place to disclose healthcare benefits prior to a first interview and the restrictions on seeking or using wage history. Additionally, employers should also consider conducting a privileged review of employee compensation to determine whether there are unexplained discrepancies that should be addressed prior to publishing pay ranges.

Seyfarth’s Pay Equity Group is continuing to monitor this area for additional updates and is available to assist employers with navigating these new requirements and the ongoing trend toward greater pay transparency.

It's Easy to Get Started

Transform compensation at your organization and get pay right — see how with a personalized demo.